Olle Wallin vs Anton Shepp Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison

• What recent second serve performance can indicate match outcomes? Wallin secures 45.37% of points, while Shepp achieves 50.46%, suggesting Shepp may have an edge in maintaining their serve.
• How do return game statistics compare? Wallin captures 44.1% of opponents' second serve points, outperforming Shepp's 30.26%. This gives Wallin an advantage in the return game.
• First serve return stats show a close contest, with Wallin at 27.58% and Shepp slightly ahead with 29.68%.
• Analyzing pressure situations, Shepp saves 58.62% of breakpoints compared to Wallin's 55.1%, indicating better performance under pressure.
• Over the last year, match win rates are close, with Wallin at 68.25% and Shepp at 66.67%.
• Which surfaces do these players excel on? Wallin performs best on indoor hard courts with a 76% win rate, while Shepp boasts a perfect 100% on clay.
• Both players largely compete in Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments; Wallin wins 68.25% and Shepp 75% of these matches.
• Wallin faces stronger opponents on average with a rank of 58.3, compared to Shepp's 80.33-ranked opponents.
• Shepp has a stronger deciding set record, winning 67% compared to Wallin's 53%.
• Wallin has a clear edge in break point conversion at 30.33%, while Shepp trails at 18.75%.

Editorial Prediction (June 12, 2025, UTC):

As Wallin and Shepp prepare to face off, the stats reveal critical insights shaping the prediction of their encounter. In second serve performance, Shepp shows a slight advantage, but Wallin makes a notable impact in return games. Specifically, Wallin's ability to capture second serve return points positions them as a formidable opponent.

When under pressure, Shepp showcases an edge by saving a higher percentage of breakpoints, pointing to resilience in match-critical moments. However, on converting break points, Wallin demonstrates a superior conversion rate, potentially crucial in turning the tide of sets and matches.

The players exhibit varied surface strengths; Wallin excels indoors on hard courts, while Shepp shows remarkable success on clay. The context of this match's surface may play a pivotal role in the advantage either player holds.

Prediction revolves around integrating these factors with the strength and quality of past opponents. Although Shepp's deciding set performance is noteworthy, Wallin's comprehensive skill in both returning and breaking serve stands out.

This analysis suggests a highly competitive match; however, Wallin's strengths in crucial statistical areas make them the likely candidate for victory in this upcoming contest.